Konventionelle kompresser og tamponer

Mestopore

Absorberende bandage med blød silikoneklæb til kontinent stomi

  • {{ feature }}

  1. Mestopore® S er en selvklæbende absorberende bandage til kontinente stomier. Safetac® teknologien sikrer, at bandagen kan fjernes og appliceres igen. Mestopore er en selvklæbende absorberende bandage til kontinente stomier. Safetac® sårkontaktlaget beskytter stomivævet mod skader. Den selvklæbende kant er ikke-sensibiliserende og ikke-irriterende, selv ved hyppige bandageskift. Mestopore S er specielt udviklet til at blive anvendt på patienter med kontinent stomi. • Giver sikker fiksering • Beskytter stomien mod kontaminering1,4 • Vandfast • Åndbarhed og absorptionsevne reducerer risikoen for maceration af huden • Tilpasser sig kroppens konturer • Kan tages af og sættes på igen • Brugervenlig løsning

    1. 01

      Absorbent pad for fluid management

    2. 02

      Breathable and shower-proof for protection and comfort

    3. 03

      Non-sensitising adhesive for gentle and secure fixation

    4. 04

      Safetac® soft silicone adhesive technology minimises damage to the wound and skin at removal thus pain at dressing change is minimised

    1. 1.Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2019.
    2. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2002.
    3. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 1998.
    4. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 1998.
    5. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2002.
    6. 1.Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2019.
    7. 4. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2017
    8. 1.Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2019.
    9. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 2002.
    10. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on file. 1998.
    11. Van Overschelde, P. et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two wound dressings used after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Poster presentation at 5th Congress of the WUWHS, Florence, Italy, 2016
    12. Silverstein P. et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 2011.
    13. Gee Kee E.L. et al. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns, 2014
    14. David F. et al. A randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone-coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds. International Wound Journal, 2017.
    15. Patton M.L. et al.. An open, prospective, randomized pilot investigation evaluating pain with the use of a soft silicone wound contact layer vs bridal veil and staples on split thickness skin grafts as a primary dressing. Journal of burn care & research, 2013
    16. Bredow J. et al. Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing. A Randomized Controlled Study in Orthopedic Surgery. Deutsche Arzteblatt International, 2018.
    17. Gotschall C.S. et al. Prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of Mepitel on children with partial-thickness scalds. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1998.
  2. Packaging level Quantity GTIN code
    {{ row.packagingLevel }} {{ row.quantity }} {{ row.gtinCode }}

    {{ item.key }}: {{ item.value }}