Incisionsbandager

Mepore

Mepore er en steril, selvklæbende og absorberende bandage.

  • {{ feature }}
  1. How the product works (da-dk)

  2. Mepore består af: - en absorberende sårpude med et integreret ikke-klæbende sårkontaktlag - en klæbekant med vandbaseret akrylatklæb. Klæbemidlet er hudvenligt og uden organiske opløsningsmidler. Klæbeområdet er dækket med to stykker overlappende beskyttelsesfilm, der muliggør aseptisk applicering - en ydre åndbar nonwoven, der yder en fysisk beskyttelse af såret. Bandagens materialeindhold: Akrylatklæb, polyester nonwoven, viskose og polyoleofin nonwoven.

    1. 01

      Self-adherent dressing

    2. 02

      Gentle removal of dressing

    3. 03

      Skin friendly adhesive

    4. 04

      Covers and protects from outside contamination

    1. Hopper GP, Deakin AH, Crane EO et al. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(4):200-203.
    2. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    3. Holm C, Petersen JS, Gronboek F et al. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. European Journal of Surgery 1998;164(3):179-183.
    4. Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV, Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV. Moist wound healing compared with standard care of treatment of primary closed vascular surgical wounds: a prospective randomized controlled study. Wound Repair & Regeneration 2007;15(5):624- 627.
    5. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    6. Leal A. Blister formation on primary wound closure sites: a comparison of two dressings. Wounds UK 2008;4(2):31-35.
    7. Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV, Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV. Moist wound healing compared with standard care of treatment of primary closed vascular surgical wounds: a prospective randomized controlled study. Wound Repair & Regeneration 2007;15(5):624- 627.
    8. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    9. Design Verification Report, Mepore
    10. Holm C, Petersen JS, Gronboek F et al. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. European Journal of Surgery 1998;164(3):179-183.
    11. Hopper GP, Deakin AH, Crane EO et al. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(4):200-203.
    12. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    13. Design Verification Report, Mepore
  3. Packaging level (da-dk) Quantity (pcs) (Da-dk) GTIN code (da-dk)
    {{ row.packagingLevel }} {{ row.quantity }} {{ row.gtinCode }}

    {{ item.key }}: {{ item.value }}

Kontakt

Spørgsmål om Mölnlycke produktdetaljer og brug

Vælg land

Få viden, lær om vores produkter, få support og meget mere.

Danish (Denmark)
Select market (da-dk)
Go to (da-dk) United States

Find job, vores finansielle rapporter og meget mere.

Mölnlycke virksomhed