Skip media
Incision Dressings

Mepore

Mepore is a sterile, self-adhesive and absorbent dressing.

  • {{ feature }}

  1. How the product works

  3. Mepore consists of: - an absorbent wound pad with an integrated non-adherent wound contact layer - an adhesive border with water based acrylic adhesive. The adhesive is skin friendly and free from organic solvents. The adhesive area is covered with two overlapping release liners enabling aseptic application - an outer breathable nonwoven providing a physical protection to the wound. Dressing material content: Acrylic adhesive, polyester nonwoven, viscose and polyoleofin nonwoven.

    1. 01

      Self-adherent dressing

    2. 02

      Gentle removal of dressing

    3. 03

      Skin friendly adhesive

    4. 04

      Covers and protects from outside contamination

    1. Hopper GP, Deakin AH, Crane EO et al. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(4):200-203.
    2. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    3. Holm C, Petersen JS, Gronboek F et al. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. European Journal of Surgery 1998;164(3):179-183.
    4. Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV, Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV. Moist wound healing compared with standard care of treatment of primary closed vascular surgical wounds: a prospective randomized controlled study. Wound Repair & Regeneration 2007;15(5):624- 627.
    5. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    6. Leal A. Blister formation on primary wound closure sites: a comparison of two dressings. Wounds UK 2008;4(2):31-35.
    7. Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV, Vogt KC, Uhlyarik M, Schroeder TV. Moist wound healing compared with standard care of treatment of primary closed vascular surgical wounds: a prospective randomized controlled study. Wound Repair & Regeneration 2007;15(5):624- 627.
    8. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    9. Design Verification Report, Mepore
    10. Holm C, Petersen JS, Gronboek F et al. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations. European Journal of Surgery 1998;164(3):179-183.
    11. Hopper GP, Deakin AH, Crane EO et al. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit. Journal of Wound Care 2012;21(4):200-203.
    12. Domini ML. Final report Hospital tests. Mepore vs Mepore Extra and Mepore Extra vs Cutiplast. Mölnlycke Health Care. 1997.
    13. Design Verification Report, Mepore
  5. Packaging level Quantity GTIN code
    {{ row.packagingLevel }} {{ row.quantity }} {{ row.gtinCode }}

    {{ item.key }}: {{ item.value }}

Related products

Show all