-
Références
- Pickering D, Marsden J. Techniques for aseptic dressing and procedures. Community Eye Health. 2015;28(89):17.
- Van Overscheide P, Sinnaeve F, Lapierre C, Pauwels A, Alam K, Sandy-Hodgetts K. A single-centre retrospective study investigating patient-reported outcomes of extended dressing wear time for incisional healing following orthopaedic surgery: the ARCTIS study. Journal of Wound Care. ISWCAP suppl. 2024; 33(8): S17–S26.
- Pickering D, Marsden J. Techniques for aseptic dressing and procedures. Community Eye Health. 2015;28(89):17.
- IFU Mepilex Ag
- Silverstein P, Heimbach D, Meites H et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res 2011, 32(6): 617-626
- Tang H, Lv G, Fu J et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015, 78(5): 1000-1007
- Palmer K, Hill J, Clegg A, One in 10 hospitalised patients have a pressure injury worldwide, Evidence-Based Nursing 2021;24:93.
- National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline, 2019, available from: https://www.npuap.org/
- Pickering D, Marsden J. Techniques for aseptic dressing and procedures. Community Eye Health. 2015;28(89):17.
- Alvarez, O.M., Granick, M.S., Reyzelman, A., Serena, T. A prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover study comparing three multilayered foam dressings for the management of chronic wounds. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2021 doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0268
- Tyson, L. Study First: Driving the Case for Improving Hospital Wound Care. Poster Presentation at WOCN Annual Meeting, Nashville, 2019.